Generation Terrorists » Forum
Sign up   |   Start new thread   |   Lost password?   |   Edit profile   |   Member List   |   myGT   |   Blog

Pro-Palestinian ?
ifihadahif Posted: Fri Apr 30 08:57:00 2004 Post | Quote in Reply  
  Viva Palestine? With Friends Like These…
Clifford D. May

April 29, 2004

Consider what's required to wear the label: “Pro-Palestinian.”

To start, you have to appear non-judgmental about innocent Palestinian children being raised to become human bombs.

You must refer to those who send such children on suicide/mass murder missions as “political leaders” or, even better, as “spiritual leaders.” Call them militants if you must, but never terrorists.

To be thought of as pro-Palestinian, you must cite the plight of the Palestinian refugees as a key motivation for violence, ignoring the fact that there would have been no refugees had Israel's Arab neighbors not launched a war to destroy the tiny Jewish state immediately upon its birth.

Indeed, Arabs who chose to stay in Israel are today Israeli citizens, as are their children, enjoying more freedoms than do the citizens of neighboring Egypt, Syria, Saudi Arabia or even Jordan. Disregard all this if you want to be seen as someone who cares about Palestinians.

Supporters of Palestinians must point to the Israeli occupation of Gaza and the West Bank as another root cause of violence. Avoid mentioning that it was a second Arab war against Israel that led to the seizure of those territories which, at that time, were not called Palestinian territories. Gaza was administered by Egypt and the West Bank by Jordan and no one demanded that they be turned them over to Palestinian sovereignty.

The Israelis captured the Sinai as well. That territory, several times larger than all of Israel, was returned to Egypt in exchange for a piece of paper promising peace. Forget these awkward details.

To burnish your pro-Palestinian credentials, even as you rail against the Israeli occupation, say nothing positive about Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's plan to end that occupation entirely in Gaza and to withdraw Israeli troops and settlements from 85 percent of the West Bank. In Orwellian fashion, insist that Mr. Sharon is giving up those lands as part of a “land grab.”

While it is true that at Camp David in 2000, then-Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak offered about 95% of the West Bank and Gaza, Yassir Arafat turned that offer down and initiated several years of terrorist attacks. Even so, Mr. Sharon has said he's willing to consider further withdrawal, to discuss permanent borders, though he won't negotiate with those dispatching terrorists. Dismiss all that as irrelevant -- if you want to be described as someone who sympathizes with the Palestinians.

Also, continue to insist that Israelis eventually must agree to a “right to return” – that they must let millions of Palestinians settle not just in an independent Palestinian state next to Israel but in Israel itself.

Promote this idea even if you're savvy enough to know it can never happen – just as Hindus can never re-settle in what is today Muslim Pakistan, just as Greek Christians can never re-settle in what is today Muslim Turkey, just as the million Jews forced to flee from Arab countries after World War II can never return to what were, for centuries, their homes.

In fact, Israelis with roots in Arab countries today comprise about half of Israel's population. They may understand better than anyone else that a Palestinian “right to return” would mean the end of Israel as a homeland for the Jewish people, that Jews would become a minority in what would no longer be the world's only predominately Jewish state. And that's a frightening thought because, sadly, few minorities living in the 22 Arab countries and the more than 50 predominately Muslim nations enjoy anything approaching freedom and equality. Such freedom and equality may be achieved in Iraq in the years ahead -- though not if the dictators of Syria, Iran and Saudi Arabia can help it, and not if the Palestinian “political and spiritual leaders” who supported Saddam Hussein and who now oppose the American “occupation” have anything to do with it.

Nor should Friends of Palestine plan for the opportunities that the Israeli withdrawals will present. Don't even think about the Israeli homes that will be turned over to Palestinian families, the hotels that could be built along the Mediterranean. Forget about foreign investors, new hospitals and schools. And certainly don't talk about cooperation with Israel. On the contrary, shrug when Hamas terrorists bomb the checkpoints through which Gazans pass on their way to work in Israeli factories. But should the Israelis respond by closing those checkpoints, complain vehemently that the Israelis are cutting off the livelihood of Palestinian workers.

The United Nations is very pro-Palestinian. That's why UN experts are not hard at work drafting a plan to give Palestinians more say over who governs them. Arafat was elected Palestinian leader – he ran exactly one time in 35 years and in that election he was opposed by a woman whose name few can recall and who hadn't a ghost of a chance. Surely, that's as much democracy as any reasonable person could desire for Palestinians.

Perhaps someday people will look back in astonishment on all this. Perhaps someday the term pro-Palestinian will be redefined to include those who would urge Palestinians to seek compromise and peaceful co-existence with their neighbors, build a real economy, and discourage their children from suicide, murder and mutilation.

Right now, however, these are wildly radical notions.

DanSRose Posted: Fri Apr 30 09:54:38 2004 Post | Quote in Reply  
  When you're right, you're right.
And, yeah, you're very much right.

zander83 Posted: Fri Apr 30 10:22:08 2004 Post | Quote in Reply  
  can't argue here either... never really understood how people can claim to be pro-palestinian... i mean i can understand if they were agaisnt Israel in the sense that they feel Isreal is not doing enough for peace... anti-Israel doen't mean pro-palestinian... too many idiots in the world

Christian Posted: Fri Apr 30 12:39:11 2004 Post | Quote in Reply  
  yes yes yes...but he's keeping the BEST and LUSHEST land (15%), how gracious of him, for his concubines!


Mark Posted: Fri Apr 30 13:37:08 2004 Post | Quote in Reply  
  hmm...true, oh so true, but I ain't pro-Israel either. I think they both kinda fscked it.

Malik Posted: Fri Apr 30 23:51:18 2004 Post | Quote in Reply  
  Can't Bush just run away and stick his head in the oil of his (and Halliburton's) own country?

ifihadahif Posted: Sat May 1 09:37:18 2004 Post | Quote in Reply  
  Malik said:
>Can't Bush just run away and stick his head in the oil of his (and Halliburton's) own country?
and this is relevant to the Palestinian problem in what way ?

DanSRose Posted: Sun May 2 23:26:38 2004 Post | Quote in Reply  
  It's not at all relevant. Two issues that are connected by the region, and therefore politics, et al.

ifihadahif Posted: Mon May 3 16:26:58 2004 Post | Quote in Reply  
  DanSRose said:
>It's not at all relevant. Two issues that are connected by the region, and therefore politics, et al.
Which two issues would they be ?
Oil and/or Haliburton have nothing to do with the Palestinian or Israeli issue.


[ Reply to this thread ] [ Start new thread ]