Quotes
Books
Famous
Friends Works
Movies
Music
My Thoughts
Articles
Human Nature
Nature
Politics
School
Technology
Links
Favorite
Hobbies
Magazines
Music
|
Appearance
Chris Ballard
18 Aug 2000
My research is observation. My method is objectivity. My process is deduction.
Control. Society needs to control those within the society in order to remain orderly. Control can be anything from subtle messages that direct thought processes to strenuous manipulation of the mind to a degree that does not guide a mind but forces a mind to a certain conclusion, with or without the thinker aware. Unfortunately for society, it cannot control every individual completely. If it could, society would have no problems functioning, as all would be wholly concerned with the survival of society and would place themselves behind such. Yet, even as it cannot control the populous absolutely, society can and must control the mindset of the individuals within society. This can best be accomplished through the installation of moral or ethical guidelines within society. The bringing of right and wrong into the minds of the people. Fortunately, humans have an acute awareness to their emotions, however, do not always have an acute understanding. Yet, the awareness can be implemented in such a manner that reinforces the idea of right and wrong, corresponding to the respective conditioned responses given by society. The logic for society and its survival is obvious. Organization of the masses of people across the world. Society cannot be escaped. Mans need for control will always create an organized body that will function, a set of rules for interaction between the people within that body, and thus society will emerge. However, society does create several byproducts. A populous that is completely dependent upon the society, although very positive for the society, is a byproduct. Limitations imposed upon the expansion and growth of the individual are byproducts, although sometimes positive. Yet, the moral individual might ask for ethical clarification about the prevention of the growth of individuals within society. The fact is that there is no moral justification. There is only the need that must be fulfilled for societies sake. It seems rather hypocritical that the system that creates and maintains our moral standards is not morally justified. However, we find this same form of hypocrisy within many of the ethical, yet powerful, organizations within our society.
Society, as its existence requires, is oppressive. Although our "free society" does not support repression it is necessary in order to sustain the order around us. Yet, what is the difference between a "free society" that oppresses and an "oppressive society" that oppresses? Perhaps the difference is within the appearance of the oppression. One believes in its own freedom, whereas one is forced to accept reality. One is morally acceptable and one unethical. One is hypocritical, the other is disillusionment. One 'happiness' the other discontentedness.
My product?
Product does not matter. Product is absolute, fact. All that matters is appearance. My product is an unethical truth. An unfortunate necessity. A revelation of double-standards. But all that matters is appearance.
|