BOBBY: Now, Eugene, we could be in for a real fight here.

EUGENE: I know.

BOBBY: She hired Solomon Taggert. Where she got the money to do that I don't know. What I do know is this guy doesn't fool around. If I have to get ugly, you have to let me.

EUGENE: I don't want your tearing her up, Bobby. At the end of the day she's still my son's mother.

BOBBY: And at the end of the day we want you to still be his father.

KENDALL: What's going on? I had to meet with those doctors and stuff. Why is nobody telling me what's going on?

EUGENE: Your, uh, mother thinks your getting involved with drugs had something to do with my influence. And, uh, she thinks it would be best if you didn't spend time with me.

KENDALL: Ever?

EUGENE: Just for a while.

KENDALL: But you're my dad.

EUGENE: It isn't about that. It's - She's doing what she thinks is best. She loves you just like I do. We just disagree on what's best.

KENDALL: And she's asking some judge to stop you from being with me?

EUGENE: Something like that, yeah.

MORRISON: Kendall has an above average IQ, but he appears to be lacking some moral responsibility with regards to his behaviour.

TAGGERT: What do you mean, doctor?

MORRISON: With the drug arrest, he focuses on the illegal search rather than his own bad act, and in lying to his parents about it afterward, he focuses on how the denial skirted the truth -

BENDER: C'mon, doctor. Growing up my children threw every excuse in the book at me. Isn't that just part of being a kid?

MORRISON: A normal kid understands when he's done something wrong, and uses the excuse as a way to escape punishment. With Kendall, it's almost as if he believes the excuse nullifies the bad act. And therein lies the problem.

TAGGERT: To what do you attribute Kendall's behaviour?

MORRISON: There could be a lot of factors. But I do believe a significant one derives from contact with his father.

TAGGERT: He's a bad role model?

MORRISON: I'm not saying that. Likely he's a great role model. I'm saying that contact with him is having a negative effect.

TAGGERT: A good model with a bad influence?

MORRISON: Mr Young is a criminal defence attorney. I certainly don't have all the answers, but I know that Kendall is somehow processing right and wrong through his father's eyes, and it's resulting in a blurring of the lines for him.

BOBBY: How many hours total did you spend with Kendall?

MORRISON: About six and a half hours.

BOBBY: And in six and a half hours you find that Eugene Young is a bad influence on his son.

MORRISON: Yes.

BOBBY: Because he's a criminal defence attorney?

MORRISON: Because of the emotional and behavioural impact he's had on his son.

BOBBY: Because he's a criminal defence attorney.

MORRISON: Mr Young faces tough moral choices. Maybe he has a handle on it, maybe he doesn't -

BOBBY: When you're saying that Mr Young faces tough moral choices you have evidence of Mr Young acting amorally?

MORRISON: Well, I think defending someone accused of murder is perhaps -

BOBBY: It's immoral for a criminal defence attorney to defend murder defendants?

MORRISON: I'm talking about how it impacts on a child.

BOBBY: It's your opinion that children can't process -

TAGGERT: He's not letting the witness finish.

BENDER: I agree. Let her complete her response, Mr Donnell.

MORRISON: Of course, every defendant deserves representation. Most eleven year olds can appreciate this. I'm speaking as to what's going on with Kendall.

BOBBY: Thank you, doctor, but how -

MORRISON: I still haven't finished. By defending these people, the drug dealers, the people that use drugs, Kendall sees an implied endorsement. Dad says these people are okay. Dad says what these people did wasn't so bad. Dad said it's the police who were at fault. These are the things this kid is processing. It's not coming from his mother.

DAWSON: She's been known to pick up men and not just with her car.

HELEN: Oh, you gotta be kidding me...

DAWSON: She's the social girl. I'm just showing that...

HELEN: That is completely irrelevant. Even if it were true, a victim's sexual history is inadmissible. Rape shield.

DAWSON: This is not a rape. Rape shield doesn't apply. And I am entitled to cross-examine my client's accuser.

JUDGE: I won't let you go there, Mr Dawson.

DAWSON: You don't know this woman, judge, she's a real...

JUDGE: Problem is, counsel, I know you. You're not going there.

SHARON: He's a good man, and in my opinion, a very good father.

TAGGERT: Well, then why are we here?

SHARON: Because of the world he lives in. My ex-husband fights for bad people. My son attributes some idealism to this world. The influence scares me. He's begun to deal drugs. With a sense of pride, even. A pride that he gets from his dad. It would be one thing if he came home wanting to defend criminals, but to identify with them as role models? This is beginning to happen.

TAGGERT: Have you talked to your ex-husband about this?

SHARON: My ex-husband breathes this world. That's what led to us splitting up. He's inside it. He defends these people on a mission. It was more important to him than being a husband, more important to him than being a father.

EUGENE: That was a lie!

BOBBY: It doesn't matter.

EUGENE: You just sat there!

BOBBY: Eugene...

EUGENE: You just let her go on with that!

BOBBY: I get my chance on cross...

EUGENE: You should've shut her down!

BOBBY: Eugene. You know she gets to tell her side. You know I had to let her.

EUGENE: She knows my values. She knows I don't honour the people I defend and she knows Kendall knows that.

BOBBY: Taggert probably told her to come on strong. Like I said, these kinds of fights we don't win by holding back. Eugene. Look at me. Now it's my turn. I don't wanna hold back. Anything you got her that I can use, now is the time to tell me. I'm friends with Sharon, I don't wanna go after her, but if you want your son back... I have no real choice. And you have to help me.

BOBBY: You're the one with the primary physical custody right now, aren't you, Sharon?

SHARON: Yes.

BOBBY: You're the one spending the most time with Kendall. Possibly you share some blame for his problems, or is that just impossible?

SHARON: I lived with Eugene for nine years. I know where the blame goes. Plan B, I know that too.

BOBBY: Plan B? What's that got to do with Eugene's parenting?

SHARON: It's got to do with Kendall always bragging that his dad can get anybody off.

BOBBY: He's a bad parent by the way he defends his clients?

SHARON: He's a bad influence when it comes to teaching him accountability.

BOBBY: What about you as a primary caretaker, refusing to accept any responsibility? What message on accountability does that send?

SHARON: I'm accepting responsibility to set my son's life back on course. I'm taking the steps necessary to see that he's raised with the right values.

BOBBY: So, your concern in all this is that Kendall learn the right values.

SHARON: Yes.

BOBBY: And you don't think that Eugene is teaching those values to Kendall?

SHARON: No. I don't.

BOBBY: And values, that's the one of the reasons you got divorced. Your difference of opinion on values. You had an affair, didn't you, Sharon?

SHARON: That was four years ago...

BOBBY: How long did that affair last?

TAGGERT: Objection, your honour. What relevance is an event that happened...

BOBBY: Excuse me, but this witness is saying that my client's character is deficient, and that his son gleaned these deficiencies. I should be allowed to question the petitioner on her character.

BENDER: I'll allow it. Answer the question.

SHARON: The affair lasted about two months.

BOBBY: And during the affair, on more than a few occasions, you told Eugene that you were having dinner with a girlfriend or that you were working late, when in fact you were seeing this man, isn't that right?

SHARON: It was wrong, I know that. But...

BOBBY: You lied to him.

SHARON: Yes.

BOBBY: And did Kendall know you were lying to his father? What kind of influence...

SHARON: Kendall never found out about either the affair or...

BOBBY: So, your son still doesn't know the truth. The deception lives on.

TAGGERT: Objection.

BOBBY: Withdrawn. The man you were seeing was married, right?

SHARON: Yes.

BOBBY: What kind of values does that teach your son, Sharon? What kind of values does he get from a mother's infidelity and adultery...

TAGGERT: Objection.

BENDER: Sustained. Move on.

BOBBY: You complain about Eugene's job. You ever once ask him to quit his job?

SHARON: I knew he never would -

BOBBY: The question was did you ever ask him to quit, yes or no?

SHARON: No, that doesn't mean -

BOBBY: Ever urge him to demand to be made partner? That ever happen?

SHARON: Yes.

BOBBY: So this world he lives in, which you so object to, you wanted him to become a partner in it. You get alimony, don't you, Sharon?

SHARON: Yes.

BOBBY: You make money off this world, you urge him to go for partner and now you cite this world as ground for parental unfitness. Is hypocrisy a value you pass on to Kendall?

TAGGERT: Objection.

BENDER: Overruled.

BOBBY: Best interest of the child, Sharon. Does that include infidelity, lying, hypocrisy -

TAGGERT: Objection.

BOBBY: After you drew this conclusion that Eugene's job wasn't good for Kendall, did you go to Eugene and say 'hey, what do we do about this?' or did you just move for full custody?

SHARON: He's not going to change.

BOBBY: You just filed for full custody without so much as a conversation, didn't you, Sharon? Don't you think it could be in Kendall's interest to work things out with his dad before ripping him away -

TAGGERT: He's badgering her.

BOBBY: Didn't Eugene deserve that much? A conversation?

TAGGERT: Your honour...

BOBBY: Didn't Kendall deserve that much?

SHARON: He's not going to change!

HELEN: So after just meeting you, she finds you so irresistible that she just had to have you.

RANDY: I guess so.

HELEN: Then you made such a favourable impression she just gave you her car?

RANDY: No, she loaned it to me. I had lost track of time and I was really late for a job interview that I had across town. The job was really important to me and it was too late for me to catch a bus.

HELEN: So, instead of offering to just drive you herself, she just gave her car to a complete stranger?

RANDY: Well, we weren't total strangers at that point. Anyway, she had some things that she needed to get done, and so I was supposed to meet her back there at that street at five o'clock.

HELEN: But you decided to keep the car instead.

RANDY: I got lost trying to find the warehouse across town where I was supposed to meet with this guy in shipping and receiving. Anyway, by the time I got back, she was gone.

HELEN: So you figured free car.

RANDY: No. I didn't have her phone number or her last name. I was searching for registration when the police arrested me. That's the truth.

MR HAYES: What's wrong?

HELEN: Well, I guess my radar.

MRS HAYES: What's going on?

HELEN: Lynette, I could be way off, but I get a gut feeling with witnesses, and after listening to Randy Strunk's testimony, it had a believable ring to it.

LYNETTE: You're not serious.

HELEN: There's just a couple of things that don't exactly make sense. I mean, after he took the car, he then returned to the same area. He didn't change the plates, he acted like an innocent person...

LYNETTE: Why would I say he just stole my car?

HELEN: Is it possible that you just thought that when he didn't come back soon enough?

LYNETTE: No. He car-jacked me.

HELEN: Mr and Mrs Hayes, can you just excuse us for a second?

MR HAYES: No. What's this about?

HELEN: I need to speak with your daughter in private. Please. Lynette. If you are making this up, a man could be facing jail.

LYNETTE: I'm not making this up.

HELEN: He car-jacked you.

LYNETTE: Yes.

HELEN: Look, I know it was your father that reported this to the police. Are you just sticking to the story you gave him?

LYNETTE: No. It's the truth.

TAGGERT: Your son got arrested for possessing drugs. Drugs that he bought off of one of your clients.

EUGENE: That was a coincidence, as I said.

TAGGERT: Your lawyer, Ms Frutt. She was recently arrested on drug charges herself, wasn't she?

EUGENE: Those charges were dismissed, she was set up by the police.

TAGGERT: That's exactly what Kendall said when you asked him how the drugs ended up in his locker, isn't it?

EUGENE: Except in Ellenor's case, it was true.

TAGGERT: A client dropped a bag of what was thought to be drugs on Ms Frutt's desk.

EUGENE: That's right.

TAGGERT: And when asked who the drugs belonged to, Ms Frutt responded 'I don't know', didn't she?

EUGENE: Yes.

TAGGERT: But she knew where the drugs came from, didn't she?

EUGENE: As lawyers, we have a duty not to betray our client's -

TAGGERT: So, Ms Frutt did the right thing by lying?

EUGENE: In that context, it wasn't lying.

TAGGERT: It was telling the truth?

EUGENE: No.

TAGGERT: Which was it?

EUGENE: It was protecting our client, which as you well know we have an ethical obligation to do.

TAGGERT: Yes. Did you sit down and explain that to your son, Mr Young?

EUGENE: Kendall knows about our duties. We have these talks -

TAGGERT: I'm not talking in general. I'm referring to that specific occasion after he witnessed Ellenor Frutt lying to the police. Did you sit down and explain the ituation to him?

EUGENE: Not that time, no.

TAGGERT: Can you honestly say that you have taught Kendall right from wrong, truth from lie?

EUGENE: I have never ever encouraged my son to break the law or to lie.

TAGGERT: Reference was made earlier to Pan B. What is that?

EUGENE: It's a defence strategy.

TAGGERT: More specifically it means accusing someone in open court of committing the crime.

EUGENE: Basically.

TAGGERT: According to recent court transcripts, you accused a brother of beheading his sister even though you didn't believe he was really involved in the death. Correct?

EUGENE: Yes.

TAGGERT: Ever sit down and talk to Kendall about why you do these things in court?

EUGENE: Yes. I have.

TAGGERT: Ever been booked on assault, Mr Young?

EUGENE: Once. The charge was dropped.

TAGGERT: You got mad at one of your clients who sodomized two young boys. You beat him up in open court, right?

BOBBY: Objection. This has no relevance.

TAGGERT: Everything is fair game. You made that clear.

TAGGERT: When this case was filed you were under court order not to discuss the merits of it with your son, Kendall. Is that right, sir?

EUGENE: Yes.

TAGGERT: You talk to him about it two nights ago?

EUGENE: He was confused as to what was going on.

TAGGERT: You basically tell him that his mother was wrong?

EUGENE: I told him we disagreed as to what was best.

TAGGERT: Well, would it surprise you that he went home with the idea that you thought she was wrong? The night before the hearing you violate a court order, position your son on your version of the merits. Are these the good footsteps for a son to step in?

REBECCA: He's being fired for a medical condition. That's contrary to law.

LAWYER FOR THE DEFENDANT: He's being terminated for an inability to perform the functions of -

REBECCA: Appearance is not a function. He has six-nerve palsy brought on by a head trauma. And there's no -

SWACKHEIM: Well, I don't know much about psychology, counsel. But I do suspect that if I were to go see a therapist to unearth my troubles, it wouldn't help to have him look back at me cross-eyed.

REBECCA: And that is bigotry. So, he looks different. In time -

SWACKHEIM: Would you step up here a minute Mr Plath. Dr Plath? I'm looking to get an idea. Um, my mother-in-law's got, uh, delirium. Tell us what that is.

PLATH: Delirium is basically a disturbance of consciousness. It can affect cognition, often manifested by reduced clarity of awareness of the environment. It can cause focus problems. Attention deficit problems are common. The person is frequently easily distracted by irrelevant stimuli. And it's often difficult to engage in long sustained periods of conversation. There's also disorientation as to time -

SWACKHEIM: I'm sorry. I'm upholding the discharge.

REBECCA: Your honour...

SWACKHEIM: Ms Washington, this may not seem fair, but it's tough to take him seriously.

REBECCA: You can't penalise him for something he can't control!

SWACKHEIM: Nor should I penalise them. Dr Plath, you may be an excellent doctor, but medicine is business these days. And under the adage you only get one change to make a first impression, I have to sympathise with the defendant as well.

REBECCA: This isn't fair.

SWACKHEIM: And your problem, young lady, is that you think justice is fair, mmm mmm.

JUDGE: I'm not a big fan of ex-party. What's the mystery?

HELEN: I'm not sure if I have good faith belief in the defendant's guilt anymore.

JUDGE: Why?

HELEN: I guess it comes down to creditability. My gut tells me she fed her father the story, he insisted on the arrest and she's cornered.

JUDGE: What have you got to support this?

HELEN: Just listening to their testimony. I think I believe him.

JUDGE: So what? You're not the jury.

HELEN: Still, if a DA doesn't have a good faith belief -

JUDGE: It may affect your bringing the charges, but your weighing the testimony... Come on.

HELEN: What if I brought a motion to dismiss?

JUDGE: Forget it. And don't tank your closing, either. Defence attorneys aren't the only ones with obligations in that room.

EUGENE: Why'd you do this, Sharon?

SHARON: Here you go. Disobeying another court order. We're not supposed to talk about this outside -

EUGENE: Why'd you do this?

SHARON: I know you love him. But I also know I'm losing him. If it were to you, I'd deal with it. But I'm losing him to something... He's a good kid becoming a bad kid. You don't see that. Either because you don't want to, or you can't.

EUGENE: Do you really think he's better cut off from me?

SHARON: Yes.

TAGGERT: This isn't about who's a better person. Or who loves Kendall more. It's what's in the boy's best interest. We've listened to the guardian, somebody who is neutral, linking Kendall's problems to his contact with his father. A boy losing an ability to distinguish right from wrong. We all saw that tape. An eleven year old boy versed on the how-to's of drug dealing. Who in this room wasn't horrified? Eugene Young was sued for intentional infliction of emotional distress when in open court he accused a brother of killing his own sister. An allegation he admittedly didn't really believe. And in defence of Eugene Young, his colleague, Jimmy Berluti, described him as being in extreme denial. A man struggling to survive what he does for a living. That struggle is affecting Kendall. We're not asking for punishment or that it be permanent, but for know we have to listen to Dr Morrison and appoint Sharon Young as full custodian. In the end, it's not about a mother and a father, it's about the welfare of an eleven year old boy, who clearly needs help.

BOBBY: We see young kids in this room every day arrested for drugs. We don't take them away from their parents, just the opposite. The courts usually plead for the parents to step in. That's exactly what Eugene Young would like to do. This is a huge overreaction to a bad event. There is nothing, absolutely nothing to even suggest any parental unfitness. Mr Taggert quoted Jimmy Berluti's closing argument as evidence. Well, he left out the part of the summation where Mr Berluti referred to Eugene Young as deeply honourable, dignified, a hero. I second that. So do you, Sharon. There is nobody, nobody who has walked through these doors with more honour, more dignity and morality than the man sitting over there.

HELEN: Randy Strunck, he's gotta be the luckiest man in the world. He meets a very attractive woman who, and even though she's a complete stranger, just can't help herself and agrees to fool around with him in her car. Then, she generously gifts him with her car. That happens every day, doesn't it? Randy isn't lucky, ladies and gentlemen. He's just careful. He chose his victim. He chose the time. He chose a location where there would be no eyewitnesses. Randy chose every single detail of the attack to work to his advantage. And after he got caught he, along with his attorney, chose the strategy of putting the victim on trial. He said she said, it was reasonable doubt. Go ahead. Put him back out there. Just don't forget to lock your car doors.

DAWSON: My definition of the luckiest man in the world wouldn't be an innocent man convicted for a crime he didn't do. Here's a flash. Sometimes the defendant actually is the victim of false charges. Maybe she thought he stood her up. Or duped her. Or maybe he wasn't really coming back with her car. I don't know what was in her mind when she told her father what happened. But she wasn't car-jacked. No bruises, no physical signs of anything violent. She wasn't car-jacked. This case reminds me of a question we used to have on tests in school when I was growing up. Orange, apple, pear, hammer. Which one doesn't fit? Here, according to Lynette Hayes, we have an attacker, with a knife, who took her car. Who also happens to know about her past relationship with an ex-boyfriend, among other things. These are the things you tell someone you have a personal relationship with, however brief. Not an attacker. Something doesn't fit.

REBECCA: I'm sorry.

PLATH: You tried. Should I appeal?

REBECCA: Sit. We could appeal, but I don't think we'd win. You're not in what we call a suspect class and there's no special protection for people with -

PLATH: Funny faces. So, you're not recommending that we keep going with this case?

REBECCA: No.

PLATH: Well, thank you for your time, Ms Washington.

REBECCA: I wish I could've been more help.

PLATH: Well, I appreciate your not laughing, anyway. Good day.

REBECCA: Goodbye, Mr Plath.

BENDER: Between all the back and forth, the one piece of evidence that stands out most is that you didn't try. The boy was arrested, the court papers were filed... The fact that you didn't first try, Ms Young, tells me that you were leading with fear and anger, and not necessarily Kendall's interests.

SHARON: That isn't true.

BENDER: Well, I'm not satisfied that you've exhausted every possible remedy. Taking away a boy's father, that's severe enough not to be the first course of action. So, I'm ordering you both to try again. If you fail, try again. Then, maybe come to me. Mr Young, I am tempted to restrain your son from coming to your office, but I'm not there yet. We seem to have two intelligent and loving parents here, so let's put some of that intelligence and love to work. For God's sake, this is not about you. This is about your son. the petition to modify custody is denied.

JUDGE: Will the defendant please rise? Madame Foreperson, the jury has reached a verdict?

FOREPERSON: We have, your honour. Commonwealth versus Randy Strunck, on the charge of assault and confinement for the purpose of stealing a motor vehicle while armed, we find the defendant, Randy Strunck, guilty.